Your Tech Story

Social media

Substack

Why is Twitter blocking Substack links?

The Twitter vs. Substack conflict persists as the social media platform appears to keep discouraging users from boosting offsite Substack posts by classifying all website links as “unsafe.”

The Verge noted that on April 7, Twitter seemed to add a warning advising users to avoid the platform and labeling them as potentially “spammy or unsafe” to all external Substack links.

substack
Image Source: bloomberg.com

Later, Elon Musk refuted reports that the website was obstructing Substack links. Then, Musk’s assertion that Substack was getting Twitter data beyond the parameters of its API database was denied by Substack co-founder Chris Best.

Also Read: Baidu Sues Apple, app developers over fake Ernie bot apps

He stated, “We feel we are in compliance with the terms, but if they have any specific concerns, we would love to know about them! We’d be happy to address any issues.”

The creators of Substack, Chris Best, Hamish McKenzie, and Jairaj Seth, expressed their disappointment with Twitter’s decision to limit writers’ ability to share their work in a statement to The Verge. They noted, “Writers should be able to freely distribute links to Substack and other websites.

This sudden shift serves as a reminder of the need for a paradigm that puts writers in control, compensates for excellent work, and safeguards free speech and the press. Their livelihoods shouldn’t be dependent on platforms where the rules can be altered at any time and where they don’t control their relationship with their audience, they continued.”

With the release of its new Notes feature earlier this week, the newsletter service appeared to throw the final switch against Twitter. This “recommendations” feed has a remarkable resemblance to the conventional, scrollable social feed that is the core of Twitter’s functionality.

Substack appeared to be offering options as users sought to abandon the Elon Musk-owned social networking platform, including a recently introduced chat feature that enables interaction between newsletter writers and subscribers. Twitter swiftly erected barriers to Substack boosters on the network, including the website’s official account.

The ability to embed tweets in stories was restricted by Twitter on Thursday. Shortly after, it appeared that tweets with links to Substack posts were no longer eligible for interaction, with users only able to quote tweet postings and no one else able to like or retweet them.

Also Read: Are Google’s AI supercomputers faster than Nvidia’s?

In December, Musk stated that he believed “relentless advertising of competitors” to be a policy violation and barred sharing links to Mastodon, Instagram, Facebook, and other sites.

These limitations, however, were later lifted. Although it is important to note that, for the time being at least, users are still able to tweet a Substack link, it is likely that he has decided to restore it now that he considers that Substack is attempting to compete with Twitter. Anyone attempting to follow it will only need to click through the warning to access the content.

Twitter

Twitter Says Parts of Its Source Code Were Leaked Online

According to court documents, portions of the software code that runs Twitter were stolen online, posing the biggest challenge for the social networking platform since Elon Musk’s turbulent $44 billion acquisition of the business late the year before.

Twitter
Image Source: upi.com

According to the documents, on March 24, Twitter served a lawsuit on the website GitHub after discovering that a user going by the name “FreeSpeechEnthusiast” had uploaded unauthorized portions of Twitter’s source code there.

Also Read: Twitter to Begin Culling Legacy Verified Marks From April 1

According to Twitter’s legal representative, the aim of the lawsuit is to locate the person who distributed the code. The paperwork was received by The U.S. District Court, Northern District, California.

The firm told CNBC that GitHub responded to Twitter’s request & erased the code the following day. As per a corporate representative, in the spirit of openness, the business discloses all DMCA takedowns, which happen when something is taken down from a site at the demand of a copyright owner.

Comment requests from Twitter did not right away receive a response.

Musk has already asserted that on March 31 Twitter will make the code used to suggest tweets publicly available. He claimed that he anticipates that people would discover silly problems and that initially disclosing the source code will be very embarrassing.

Our “algorithm” is overly complex & not fully understood internally. People will discover many silly things, but we’ll patch issues as soon as they’re found! We’re developing a simplified approach to serve more compelling tweets, but it’s still a work in progress. That’ll also be open source. Providing code transparency will be incredibly embarrassing at first, but it should lead to rapid improvement in recommendation quality. Most importantly, we hope to earn your trust.” He said in a tweet.

Source: shrty.rf.gd

“GitHub does not generally comment on decisions to remove content. However, in the interest of transparency, we share every DMCA [Digital Millennium Copyright Act] takedown request publicly,” a GitHub spokesperson told the BBC.

Source: bbc.com

Also Read: Google begins opening access to its ChatGPT competitor Bard

Elon Musk, a billionaire who purchased Twitter last October for $44 billion and afterward took the firm private, faces new difficulties as a result of the leak. Ever since it has descended into disarray as a result of widespread layoffs and the exodus of advertising.

As per documents disclosed in a congressional report, the Federal Trade Commission is looking into Musk’s mass firings at Twitter and attempting to access his private communications as a part of its ongoing investigation into the social networking firm’s privacy as well as cybersecurity practices.

Twitter

Twitter to Begin Culling Legacy Verified Marks From April 1

Next week, Twitter will start removing the legacy verified marks from user profiles. The company is moving towards a system where only paid subscribers and people who are part of approved organizations have that status.

Since November 2022, Twitter Blue members may also show the blue “verified” checkmark on their profiles. “Legacy verified” accounts on Twitter are those that had already been verified under the prior system. Twitter announced in a tweet on Thursday that the move to eliminate legacy verification will start on April 1.

Twitter
Image Source: japantimes.co.jp

According to the website, on April 1st, it “will start winding down [its] legacy verified program and removing legacy verified checkmarks.” It was always clear that the company wanted to do this.

Also Read: U.S. SEC threatens to sue Coinbase over some crypto products

Elon Musk, the CEO of Twitter, stated that “far too many corrupt legacy Blue’verification’ checkmarks exist” and that the business is going to eliminate them in the upcoming months shortly after Twitter Blue was first introduced in November 2022.

The blue verification mark has become a key component of Twitter’s Twitter Blue subscription service, which Musk initially priced at $8 per month and now touts as the best method to use and advance the service. More paying subscribers, according to Musk, would also help to fix Twitter’s bot issue. According to the company, paying Blue users receive greater priority in searches and replies, which helps combat spam and scams. Additionally, they can edit tweets and get receive much fewer ads.

Just as Twitter Blue subscriptions went global, Twitter made a statement regarding legacy verified users. With this rollout, the service will be available to more people than it was previously. Paying subscribers will also receive a blue tick, have access to 4,000-character tweets, be able to edit their tweets, and benefit from better reply rankings.

If the company wants to reach Musk’s objective of having half of its income come from subscriptions, it must increase the availability of Blue. We’ll just have to see whether or not there are enough customers ready to pay the $8 monthly fee (or $11 if they pay via the iOS app) for its benefits.

Numerous journalists and public personalities are among those designated as verified without the Twitter Blue subscription. During the years that Twitter operated without Musk, this blue tick system assisted in establishing the veracity of assertions and reports emanating from those profiles and elevated Twitter to the status of a reliable news source.

Also Read: Trump returns to YouTube and Facebook after a two-year ban

Musk’s hatred for the old system has frequently been expressed in light of his contempt for journalists, who have frequently been the busiest verified users on Twitter. After largely ignoring journalist inquiries in previous months, Musk this month set the press@twitter.com email account to automatically reply with a poop emoji.

Meta

Why is Meta being sued by its home county, San Mateo?

The school board in Meta Platforms Inc.’s home county filed a lawsuit against the business for allegedly encouraging student addiction to its social media networks and causing a crisis of mental health.

Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Facebook has been named in a lawsuit by the San Mateo County Board of Education filed against Google, TikTok, and Snap-on March 13. The distance between Redwood City, the county seat, and Meta’s offices in Menlo Park, California, is roughly four miles.

Meta
Image Source: reuters.com

The complaint is comparable to a first-of-its-kind lawsuit brought by the Seattle school district in January, which claims that the companies deliberately created their social media platforms to be alluring and to send harmful content to children and teenagers.

Also Read: What’s behind bitcoin’s latest surge?

Numerous other school systems, as well as numerous children and their parents, have filed lawsuits in places like Florida and Arizona. According to the complaint, San Mateo’s board of education claims it is allocating “unprecedented resources” to help children harmed by excessive time spent on screens and diverting funds from traditional educational objectives to deal with psychological issues that “have no historic analog,” such as increased suicide rates.

According to Antigone Davis, the global head of safety at Meta, the company wants teenagers to stay secure online and provides over 30 safety tools for children and families, including age verification technology and parental control.

In a statement, Davis said, “We automatically set teens’ accounts to private when they join Instagram, and we send notifications encouraging them to take regular breaks.

We don’t allow content that promotes suicide, self-harm, or eating disorders, and of the content we remove or take action on, we identify over 99% of it before it’s reported to us.”

The billionaire CEO of Meta, Mark Zuckerberg, has previously supported the educational change, contributing $120 million to San Francisco Bay Area schools almost ten years ago.

Also Read: Why Google suspended China’s Pinduoduo app?

But in the 116-page lawsuit, Facebook and Instagram are referred to as a public nuisance, and Meta and the other businesses are charged with racketeering, gross negligence, conspiracy, and unfair competition.

At a Congressional hearing on Thursday, issues related to social media addiction were brought up as TikTok CEO Shou Chew fought back against efforts by US legislators and the Biden administration to compel the business’s Chinese parent firm, ByteDance, to forfeit its shares of the unit or shut it in the US.

The meeting was attended by the parents of a 16-year-old boy who committed suicide after using TikTok. The pair filed a lawsuit against ByteDance, claiming that TikTok sent their son over 1,000 videos about self-harm, suicide, and hopelessness.

age verification tools

Instagram starts testing its age verification tools in more countries

Meta revealed that it had begun trying its Instagram age-verification tools in additional nations, including Mexico and Canada. In June of last year, the social networking app started experimenting with three new ways for people to verify their age: uploading their ID, making a video selfie, or requesting friends who know them to do so.

age verification tools
Image Source: news.yahoo.com

Instagram would ask a user to verify their age with one of the three ways if they tried to change their birth date from under 18 to 18 or older.

Also Read: Google expands Gmail client-side encryption to more users

The test was first made available in the USA, and in October it was also made available in Brazil and Japan. Currently, more nations in Europe, Mexico, Canada, South Korea, Australia, and Japan are testing the age verification tools. In the upcoming months, Meta intends to make the tools accessible on a worldwide scale.

You can present an ID, such as a passport or a driver’s licence, to prove your identity. In this case, Instagram will keep your ID on its systems for 30 days before deleting it. You can use the video selfie approach if you do not have a valid ID. For this choice, Instagram has teamed up with London-based digital identification start-up Yoti.

Once you submit a video selfie, Yoti receives it and uses specially trained AI to confirm your age. Both businesses erase the data after the verification procedure is finished. The third method of age verification is known as “social vouching,” and it entails asking mutual followers to attest to your age.

The individual providing the vouch must be at least 18 years old and cannot be providing a vouch at the same time for another person. You will be asked to confirm your age, and the three individuals you choose to vouch for you will have three days to do so.

The people who are vouching for you will have the option to indicate your age range, such as under 13, 13–17, 18–20, 21, or older, or I’m not sure. Your age verification will only be accepted if all three of them select the same choice.

According to Meta, since it began trying age verification on Instagram last year, its evaluations have shown that it was able to thwart 96% of the teenagers who tried to change their birthdays on Instagram from under 18 to 18 or over. In an effort to prevent users under the age of 13 from signing up for the app, Instagram began requesting new users to enter their birthdates in 2019.

Also Read: Microsoft brings iMessage to Windows 11, will it last?

The social media platform made submitting one’s birthdate a requirement starting in 2021. The same year, it introduced teen-friendly restrictions like the ability to ban DMs from unauthorized adults and make profiles private by default for individuals under the age of 16.

Twitter

Jack Dorsey’s New ‘Decentralized’ Twitter Hits the App Store

More beta testers are getting access to Bluesky, the Twitter substitute supported by Jack Dorsey, co-founder and CEO of Twitter. Even though the application is still only accessible via invite, its appearance on the App Store suggests that a public debut may be close.

Initially intended to be a “decentralized social network” and a Twitter extension, Bluesky eventually split off to create its own network.

Twitter
Image Source: coinscreed.com

Early in the previous year, the company made the announcement that it had become independent, writing on Twitter, “Both Twitter and Bluesky realized that our independence is important to the success of the project, which is why we established an independent company to ensure that we serve the broadest possible interests.”

Also Read: Twitter Cuts More Engineering, and Product Jobs to Curb Costs

Last year, Bluesky reported receiving $13 million to guarantee it had the autonomy and liberty to begin working on R&D. It also mentioned having Jack Dorsey on its board of directors. Furthermore, it stated that the funding provided by Twitter to Bluesky was “not subject to any conditions except one: that Bluesky was to research and develop technologies that enable open and decentralized public conversation.”

Authenticated Transfer Protocol, or AT, is Bluesky’s primary focus, and the Bluesky mobile app functions as a demonstration of the protocol in use. AT gives users the ability to build a federated, decentralized social network in a manner akin to the ActivityPub system that powers Mastodon.

The project has drawn some criticism, particularly from Mastodon and other devs who noted that ActivityPub, a suggested W3C standard, already drives a sizable and expanding “Fediverse” of connected servers. And since Musk bought Twitter, Mastodon, an open-source, decentralized alternative, has been growing in popularity among Twitter users who switched to the fediverse.

Users who want to participate can send their emails to be added to a waiting list and download the Beta app from the App Store, which is available only by invitation.

The interface of Bluesky, according to TechCrunch, is similar to that of Twitter with a few minor variations, such as asking “What’s up?” in the text box rather than “What’s happening,” but it simplifies it through the addition of a plus icon to add 256 characters with the feature to add pictures.

Moving to Bluesky might be seen as a hassle given the destruction of much more than a decade’s worth of tweets, recollections, and hot takes, leading users to wonder why they should do so. In 2021, during the Twitter ban imposed by then-president Donald Trump, Dorsey began pushing the concept of Bluesky. He challenged if the suspension was the best course of action.

Also Read: Uber’s Redesigned App Puts The Focus On Personalization

An open and free global internet can’t be eroded by these things, according to Dorsey, who also argued that the platform should examine how its service might encourage damage and diversion.

Dorsey stated that he thought Bluesky would separate from Twitter in a manner that would slow content moderation on larger platforms and lessen their influence over who is in charge of moderating that content.