Your Tech Story

Google

Google Wins Battle Against €1.5 Billion EU Fine for Ads Abuse

Google Wins Battle Against €1.5 Billion EU Fine for Ads Abuse

Google has got triumph in contested a €1.5 billion fine levied by the European Union (EU). It was because of engaging in anti-competitive conduct concerning online advertising. It marked a noteworthy judicial triumph. The 2019 fine was partially overturned by the General Court of the EU in Luxembourg and it sided with the tech giant. The penalty was first levied to prevent competitors like Microsoft and Yahoo from running advertisements on websites owned by third parties.

What Happened

Google Wins Battle Against €1.5 Billion EU Fine for Ads Abuse

Image Source: tech.hindustantimes.com

The European Commission concluded after looking into Google’s AdSense program that the company had exploited its dominance in the online ad brokerage market. There is evidence indicating that a period of time occurred between 2006 and 2016. It happened when Google’s contracts prevented rival search ads from showing up on websites which utilized Google’s search engine, giving the company an unfair competitive advantage.

But the Commission’s inquiry contained flaws, according to the court, especially in how it determined how long and how serious the violations were.

EU Commission Errors

The Commission’s conclusions were largely confirmed by the court, but it found errors in the assessment of the extent of the purported violations. Judges determined that the Commission had not provided sufficient evidence to establish that Google’s actions constituted a persistent and singular violation of EU antitrust laws. This ruling allows for more appeals and this could lead to the case being heard by the EU’s top court renowned as the Court of Justice.

Google's Reaction

Google said it was pleased with the court’s judgment, finding that it supported its stance and verified the errors in the initial probe. The business argued that, even before to the Commission’s decision, it had already amended its contracts in 2016 to remove the problematic language.

Ramifications for Large Technology

With its recent setback over a €2.4 billion fine for favouring its own services in search results, Google’s victory comes at a critical juncture. The case represents a turning point in the EU’s protracted attempts, led by antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager, to limit Big Tech’s dominance. Despite this win, Google’s ad technology division is still under regulatory examination in the US and the EU.

Google Fails to Overturn €2.4 Billion EU Antitrust Fine in Court

Google Fails to Overturn €2.4 Billion EU Antitrust Fine in Court

Google lost its legal battle in opposition to a €2.4 billion antitrust sentence levied by the European Union, marking a significant win for European regulators. The fine, which was imposed in 2017 for the company’s deceptive promotion of its own shopping service above rivals’, was maintained by the EU’s highest court.

Verified Discriminatory Practices

Google Fails to Overturn €2.4 Billion EU Antitrust Fine in Court

Image Source: telecom.economictimes.indiatimes.com

Due to Google’s practice of giving preference to its own retail comparison results in search rankings, the European Court of Justice concluded that the company’s actions were discriminatory. Because it hampered competitors and lessened competition in a market that was already fragile, this activity was found to be illegal under EU competition law. There is no right of appeal for this final decision.

Google was first penalised for using search result manipulation to push its own Google Shopping service to the top of the results while hiding other services in less noticeable spots. This marked a change in the way big tech companies are controlled, as it was the first of several antitrust actions brought against the tech behemoth in Europe.

Greater Consequences for Big Technology

Additionally, this decision opens the door for more extensive enforcement under the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), which went into force in 2023. The DMA forbids self-preferencing on its platforms and targets digital businesses that are regarded as “gatekeepers.” Although Google changed its business practices in 2017 to comply with the original order, it is still being investigated for possible DMA violations involving its search and app stores.

In a reaction, Agustín Reyna, Director General of consumer group BEUC, said he welcomes the decision, calling it "crucially important for Europe’s consumers."

"The Court has confirmed that Google cannot unfairly deny European consumers access to full and unbiased online information about where to get the best deals," Reyna said.

Tech lobby organisation CCIA Europe said in a statement “It is essential that companies in Europe know when competition law will force them to share their technology with their rivals. These companies need legal certainty in advance, they shouldn't be punished after the fact for competing successfully.”

euronews.com

Google's Reaction

Google voiced its dissatisfaction with the court’s ruling. According to a corporate representative, the company implemented noteworthy modifications after the initial 2017 verdict, resulting in billions of clicks for more than 800 comparison shopping platforms. Rivals counter that these changes haven’t sufficiently levelled the playing field in spite of this.

This result strengthens the European Union’s regulatory strategy and gives rise to additional action against major tech corporations.

 
UK Wraps Up Google, Apple Investigations as New Digital Rules Regime

UK Wraps Up Google, Apple Investigations as New Digital Rules Regime

The United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has announced the closure of its ongoing investigations into Google’s Play Store and Apple’s App Store, citing the upcoming implementation of the new Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act (DMCCA) as the reason. The CMA had previously extended its timeline for reviewing the practices of both tech giants, particularly concerning the distribution of apps on their respective platforms. This move signals a shift in the regulator’s approach, as it prepares to wield broader powers under the new digital markets regime.

Initial Concerns Over App Store Billing Practices

UK Wraps Up Google, Apple Investigations as New Digital Rules Regime

Image Source: androiduj.cz

The CMA’s investigations initially centered on the billing systems mandated by Google and Apple for in-app purchases on their platforms. App developers were required to use Google Play’s or Apple’s own billing systems, which the CMA believed limited the developers’ choice of payment solutions and hampered their ability to interact directly with customers. The regulator was particularly concerned that these practices stifled competition by making it difficult for developers to offer alternative payment options, potentially leading to higher costs for consumers and less innovation in the app market.

In response to the CMA’s concerns, Google proposed several commitments aimed at addressing the issue. These proposals included Developer-only Billing (DOB) and User Choice Billing (UCB), which would have allowed app developers to use alternative payment methods instead of being restricted to Google Play’s billing system. However, after consulting with app developers and reviewing the evidence, the CMA concluded that Google’s proposals were insufficient to resolve the competition concerns effectively.

CMA’s Strategic Shift in Light of the DMCCA

With the passing of the DMCCA in May, the CMA reassessed its ongoing investigations into Google and Apple’s app store practices. The agency decided to close these cases, recognizing that the new pro-competition digital markets regime would provide more comprehensive tools to address the concerns identified in its earlier probes.

Will Hayter, Executive Director for Digital Markets at the CMA, emphasized the importance of the new legislation, stating, “Once the new pro-competition digital markets regime comes into force, we’ll be able to consider applying those new powers to concerns we have already identified through our existing work.” He also highlighted that if Google or Apple are designated as having “strategic market status” in connection with any digital activities, the CMA will have the authority to examine these issues more holistically and potentially implement necessary interventions.

Implications for the Future

The CMA’s decision to close the cases reflects a broader anticipation of the enhanced regulatory framework under the DMCCA. This legislation will likely empower the CMA to tackle competition concerns more effectively, potentially leading to significant changes in how digital markets operate in the UK. The outcome of these investigations and any future interventions will be closely watched by industry stakeholders, as they may set new precedents for the regulation of dominant tech companies.

Ram Shriram: From Entrepreneur to Billionaire as Google’s First Investor

Ram Shriram: From Entrepreneur to Billionaire as Google’s First Investor

The narrative of Ram Shriram’s ascent from a middle-class Chennai childhood to a millionaire and prominent figure in Silicon Valley is one of perseverance and vision. Shriram was born in 1956, and the loss of his father affected his early years. This hardship strengthened his bonds with his family and helped to mould his resilient personality. Shriram, who had a solid background in maths and physics, studied for a higher degree in India and then the US. He completed his Masters in Business Administration from the University of Michigan.

Professional Advancements in Silicon Valley

Ram Shriram: From Entrepreneur to Billionaire as Google’s First Investor

Image Source: wired.com

At Bell-Northern Research, where he started his career, Shriram studied cutting edge technologies. His big break came when he joined Netscape, one of the first businesses on the internet back in 1994. But it was his position at Amazon following its takeover of Junglee that cemented his standing as a prominent figure in the tech sector. Working closely with Jeff Bezos, Shriram was essential to the early expansion of Amazon.

The Sherpalo Ventures Foundation

Sherpalo Ventures, a venture capital business that has supported many successful entrepreneurs, was formed by Shriram in 2000. His most well-known investment, though, was in Google. Early on, Shriram invested $500,000 in Sergey Brin and Larry Page’s search engine because he saw its potential; this was a move that would pay off handsomely. His continued connection with Alphabet, the parent firm of Google, demonstrates his enduring impact.

Charity and Heritage

Beyond his achievements in the tech sector, Ram Shriram has made significant contributions to society; his dedication to philanthropy is evidence of his conviction in giving back to the community. He has made large expenditures in healthcare and education through the Shriram Family Foundation because he thinks these sectors are essential to long-term societal advancement. His $61 million donation to Stanford University, where both of his daughters were students, was one of his most well-known charitable deeds. This kind donation, which emphasised Shriram’s commitment to boosting education in subjects that spur creativity, was intended to help engineering activities.

In summary, Ram Shriram’s life story is a compelling tale of fortitude, vision, and significant contributions to the IT sector and society at large. Shriram’s story, from his modest origins in Chennai to his rise to prominence in Silicon Valley, is a prime example of the benefits of taking calculated chances and remaining dedicated to one’s objectives. In addition to changing his life, his early investment in Google was instrumental in creating the modern digital environment.

Google-Parent Alphabet’s Partnership with AI Firm Anthropic Under Investigation in the UK

Google-Parent Alphabet’s Partnership with AI Firm Anthropic Under Investigation in the UK

Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is scrutinising Google-parent Alphabet’s partnership with artificial intelligence (AI) startup Anthropic to assess its impact on competition, the regulator announced on Tuesday. This investigation highlights growing global concerns among antitrust regulators about the increasing influence of major tech companies in the burgeoning AI sector.

Google-Parent Alphabet’s Partnership with AI Firm Anthropic Under Investigation in the UK

Image Source: cnbc.com

The partnership between Alphabet and Anthropic comes under the spotlight more than 18 months after Microsoft-backed OpenAI triggered an AI boom with the release of ChatGPT. The CMA’s probe aligns with similar inquiries into other significant deals between tech giants and smaller AI firms. Notable partnerships under review include Microsoft’s collaborations with OpenAI, Inflection AI, and Mistral AI, alongside Alphabet’s connections to companies like Anthropic and Cohere.

Global Coordination on AI Competition

The examination of Alphabet’s partnership with Anthropic is part of a broader initiative to ensure fair competition in the AI industry. Last week, the CMA, along with antitrust regulators from the United States and the European Union, issued a joint statement pledging to work together to maintain competitive markets in AI.

Anthropic, co-founded by former OpenAI executives Dario and Daniela Amodei, has been a significant player in the AI landscape with its Claude AI models competing against OpenAI’s GPT series. Last year, Anthropic announced securing $500 million from Alphabet, with a promise of an additional $1.5 billion in the future. The startup also utilizes Google Cloud services as part of its operations.

The CMA is currently seeking public and industry feedback on whether the Alphabet-Anthropic partnership could potentially lessen competition in the UK market. Interested parties have until August 13 to submit their comments. Based on this input, the CMA will decide whether to launch a formal investigation into the partnership.

Responses from Alphabet and Anthropic

In response to the CMA’s inquiry, a spokesperson for Anthropic expressed the company’s willingness to cooperate fully, emphasizing their independence. “We are an independent company and none of our strategic partnerships or investor relationships diminish the independence of our corporate governance or our freedom to partner with others,” the spokesperson stated.

Similarly, Google reiterated its commitment to fostering an open and innovative AI ecosystem. “Anthropic is free to use multiple cloud providers and does, and we don’t demand exclusive tech rights,” a Google spokesperson said.

As antitrust regulators continue to scrutinize the alliances between major tech firms and AI startups, the outcome of the CMA’s investigation into Alphabet and Anthropic will be closely watched. The decision could set a precedent for how similar partnerships are regulated in the future, potentially reshaping the competitive dynamics of the AI industry.

Israeli Cybersecurity Firm Wiz Ends $23 Billion Acquisition Talks with Google

Israeli Cybersecurity Firm Wiz Ends $23 Billion Acquisition Talks with Google

Israeli cybersecurity startup Wiz has officially ended negotiations with Google parent Alphabet regarding a proposed $23 billion acquisition, a move that would have marked the largest purchase ever by the U.S. tech giant. The cessation of talks was detailed in a memo from Wiz CEO Assaf Rappaport, which was reviewed by CNN. In the memo, Rappaport expressed gratitude for the interest shown by Alphabet but reiterated the company’s commitment to its independent growth strategy.

Israeli Cybersecurity Firm Wiz Ends $23 Billion Acquisition Talks with Google

Image Source: rte.ie

“I know the last week has been intense, with the buzz about a potential acquisition. While we are flattered by offers we have received, we have chosen to continue on our path to building Wiz,” Rappaport wrote. The CEO highlighted that the company’s immediate focus will now shift towards an initial public offering (IPO) and achieving an ambitious goal of generating $1 billion in annual revenue.

Shift in Focus Towards IPO and Revenue Growth

The discussions with Google initially began after Wiz successfully raised $1 billion from venture capital investors earlier this year, which valued the company at $12 billion. This significant funding round was a testament to Wiz’s growing influence and the effectiveness of its cloud-based cybersecurity solutions, designed to help organizations identify and mitigate critical risks on cloud platforms.

The decision to terminate the acquisition talks represents a strategic pivot for Wiz. “We believe our best path forward is to build on the strong foundation we have established and continue to innovate in the cybersecurity space,” Rappaport stated. By aiming for an IPO, Wiz is positioning itself to expand its market presence and secure the financial resources needed for sustained growth.

Impact on Google and Alphabet’s M&A Strategy

The termination of the deal is a notable setback for Alphabet, which has been aggressively investing in its cloud infrastructure and expanding its client base. Alphabet’s cloud business generated over $33 billion in revenue last year, and acquiring Wiz was seen as a strategic move to bolster its cybersecurity capabilities, particularly in the cloud sector.

This development follows another recent disappointment for Alphabet in its mergers and acquisitions (M&A) efforts, after the company reportedly decided not to pursue a deal with online marketing software company HubSpot. Despite these setbacks, Alphabet continues to focus on enhancing its cloud services portfolio. In March 2022, the tech giant acquired cybersecurity firm Mandiant for $5.4 billion, underscoring its ongoing commitment to strengthening its position in the cybersecurity market.

Wiz’s choice to remain independent and focus on organic growth underscores the dynamic and competitive nature of the tech industry, where strategic decisions can significantly impact market trajectories and corporate fortunes.