Your Tech Story

Sandhya Gupta

I am a law graduate from NLU Lucknow. I have a flair for creative writing and hence in my free time work as a freelance content writer.

Do Won Chang

Do Won Chang: The success story of the founder of Forever 21

Do Won Chang is an American businessman of Korean descent. Together with his partner Jin Sook Chang, he established the popular clothing retailer brand Forever 21.

Do Won Chang
Image Source: failurebeforesuccess.com

Early Life

Do Won Chang was born in Seoul, South Korea. He developed a strong work ethic early from an early age. He never went to college. Growing up, he worked at coffee shops before launching his independent coffee delivery business. Don Chang and his wife Jin Sook immigrated to the United States in 1981.

They worked almost 19 hours every day to sustain themselves after arriving in Los Angeles. Chang had to work multiple jobs at once. He held jobs as a janitor, a gas station attendant, and a barista in coffee shops. However, after settling in the United States for some time, he realized that a career in fashion might be his passport to success. He observed that all the rich people around worked in the fashion industry.

Success Story

The pair was able to save $11,000 after working three years in the country. They started a 900-square-foot clothing boutique. Do Wan Chang opened his first clothing store in the Highland Park neighborhood of Los Angeles in 1984 utilizing the earnings from previous jobs.

He promoted it to his fellow Korean Americans under the name Fashion 21. Sales increased tremendously from $35,000 to $700,000 in just the first year of the launch. But as the company prospered, he desired to increase the diversity of his customers. In order to draw in more people, Chang renamed his store Forever 21.

By 2013, there were over 480 outlets and $3.7 billion in sales. With $4.4 billion in worldwide sales in 2015, Forever 21’s sales hit an all-time high. In 2016, the business generated $4.4 billion in revenue and employed 43,000 people over 790 outlets throughout 48 nations, including his home South Korea.

Do Won Chang and his spouse successfully built Forever 21 utilizing their own resources. Many business owners around the world are inspired by their success. Unfortunately, in 2019 the company sought bankruptcy protection as a result of the rise in internet merchants. Forever 21 remains one of the most well-known brands in the world, despite this.

Do Won claimed that he values his family more than any other standard of achievement. Linda and Esther, his two daughters, are also working for the company. Riley Rose, a line of cosmetics and accessories sold in Forever 21 stores, was founded by Esther and Linda Chang.

Forever 21 has been sued numerous times in recent years for allegedly violating the copyright of designers like Diane Von Furstenberg and Gwen Stefani. The family has never, however, been held accountable for copyright violation. In fact, jewelry designer Alexis Bittar was ecstatic when they began selling inexpensive replicas of his jewelry because he saw it as praise that someone considered his ideas were significant enough to replicate.

Chang and his spouse immigrated to the United States with only a high school degree,  In order to provide for his family, he worked three jobs. The pair put forth a lot of effort early on and never gave up. Their success story suggests that anything is possible if one has faith in themselves.

elon musk

Elon Musk says in court he doesn’t want to be CEO of any company, tries to walk back SEC insults

Elon Musk stated in court on Wednesday that he doesn’t desire to lead any company as a CEO.Musk made the casual remark while responding to queries from attorneys for Tesla. He stated, “ I frankly don’t want to be the CEO of any company”.

elon musk
Image Source: businessinsider.in

Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick of the Delaware Chancery Court is hearing testimony in a case to decide whether Musk, the richest man in the world, should be required to surrender stock options granted as part of his compensation package to Tesla.

The trial, which began on Monday, will examine whether Tesla’s board acted properly when it authorized Musk’s compensation package, which, at the current share price, is currently estimated to be worth $52 billion. It will also examine if Elon had any undue influence on the decision.

Richard J. Tornetta, a shareholder, has filed a lawsuit against Musk and Tesla, claiming that the CEO’s salary was exorbitant and that the Tesla board’s approval of it constituted a violation of its fiduciary obligations. According to Tornetta, the board gave a part-time boss the biggest remuneration package in the world.

Read More: Elon Musk publicly fires Twitter engineers who call him out online

Attorneys for the plaintiffs questioned Musk about previous taunts he directed at the Securities and Exchange Commission and whether it was a good idea for him to have a hostile demeanor with regulators. “SEC, three letter acronym, middle word is Elon’s” Musk wrote in a tweet on July 2, 2020, when Tesla share price was experiencing a sharp rise.

Many people perceived the message to be filthy in nature and to be a serious insult to the regulating agency. Attorneys questioned Musk about his tweet in the Delaware court, and Musk said that it had been widely misinterpreted. Although the tweet was “interpreted differently,” Tesla CEO claimed in court that he intended the initials to signify “Save Elon’s Company.”

Elon Musk stated in court, “In general, I think the mission of the SEC is good but the question is whether that mission is being executed well. In some cases I think it is not. The SEC fails to investigate things that they should and places far too much attention on things that are not relevant.

The recent FTX thing I think is an example of that. Why was there no attention given to FTX? Investors lost billions. Yet the SEC continues to hound me despite shareholders being greatly rewarded. This makes no sense.”

When Musk claimed in tweets in 2018, that he was considering taking Tesla private at $420 per share and had “funding secured,” the SEC filed charges against Tesla and Elon Musk for making “false and misleading” assertions to shareholders. Following Musk’s tweets, the value of Tesla shares increased by more than 6%, and trading was suspended the same day.

For several weeks following the incident, Tesla’s share prices were volatile. In a settlement deal, Tesla and Musk stipulated that Musk would forfeit his position as chairman of Tesla for three years, pay a $20 million penalty, and refrain from denying the SEC’s claims or claiming innocence.

Musk and Tesla also agreed to have the CEO’s tweets reviewed by a securities attorney before publication if they contained important information about the company that would affect the value of Tesla’s stock.

The attorneys for Tornetta questioned Musk on whether he had a securities attorney evaluate all of his tweets regarding Tesla and why he had maintained maintaining his innocence, even in press appearances.

Musk appeared to admit that he doesn’t have a lawyer first review all of his tweets on Tesla. He stated, “The consent decree was made under duress. An agreement made under duress is not valid, as a foundation of law.”

elon musk

Elon Musk publicly fires Twitter engineers who call him out online

Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter Inc., has resorted to terminating company engineers who openly disagree with him on the social media platform.

elon musk
Image Source: fortune.com

The argument started when Elon Musk apologized for the Twitter Android app being “super slow in many countries.” He asserted that was the result of the app’s poor writing. He tweeted, “Btw, I’d like to apologize for Twitter being super slow in many countries. App is doing >1000 poorly batched RPCs just to render a home timeline!”

After that, Eric Frohnhoefer, a Twitter engineer, who worked on the Twitter Android app asserted that Mr. Musk’s statement was inaccurate in a quote tweet. Given that he has been working on Twitter’s Android app for about six years, Eric Fraunhoefer asserted that he “can say this is wrong.”

Although Mr. Frohnhoefer acknowledged that Android has “plenty of room for performance improvements,” he disagreed with Mr. Musk’s explanation for the origin of the speed issues.

Read More: Elon Musk fires thousands of contract workers without notice

He claimed that the features that few users utilize, the bloated nature of the app over time as a result of attempts to make additional upgrades, and the poor network communication were the real causes of the issues. Frohnhoefer recommended Twitter to prioritize streamlining the app by getting rid of unnecessary features and limiting the number of new ones.

The two then carried on arguing about Twitter in general, including talking about its lunches at headquarters, as well as the Android app particularly.

Frohnhoefer attempted to express his thoughts in a series of tweets, but one person questioned him as to why he hadn’t privately given his new boss his opinion. Frohnhoefer who has been an engineer at Twitter for over eight years, retorted, “Maybe he should ask questions privately. Maybe use Slack or email.”

Numerous others pointed out that Frohnhoefer was probably placing himself in danger by publicly correcting Twitter’s new owner, particularly given the fact that he has already laid off about half the company’s staff.  These warnings came true on Monday. Mr. Musk announced the engineer’s firing via Twitter.

While this was going on, one of the users tagged Musk and asked if he wanted “this kind of attitude” on his team. Musk spoke bluntly and responded, ” He’s Fired”. Frohnhoefer replied by tweeting a salute emoji.

Mr. Frohnhoefer had said he had a variety of opportunities if he was to leave Twitter. He stated that his LinkedIn has “never been more popular,” and a Reddit developer publicly messaged him to recommend that he apply there instead.

Ben Leib, another engineer, lost his job after criticizing Musk. He retweeted the same post from Musk and wrote, “As the former tech lead for timelines infrastructure at Twitter, I can confidently say that this man has no idea wtf he’s talking about.” Leib, who spent ten years working for Twitter, acknowledged his termination to Bloomberg on Sunday.

There has been a frenzy of changes ever since Twitter was acquired by entrepreneur Elon Musk. Musk has made several significant changes to Twitter, including the announcement of Twitter Blue, an $8 monthly membership service, and the firing of close to 50% of the staff.

Many employees are still angry with Musk’s decision to fire half of the company’s 7,000+ employees, including most of the senior management, just one week after his $44 billion acquisition. Additionally, the tycoon rapidly altered the organization’s workplace culture.

Although it was not common practice for Twitter employees to publicly criticize the company’s leadership in the past, before Musk arrived, many employees voiced their concerns or criticisms via email and internal Slack channels.

former tesla director

Former Tesla Australia director pleads guilty to insider trading on lithium deal

A former Tesla director has admitted to insider trading after gaining over $30,000 from buying shares of a lithium business 12 days before the company announced a significant contract with Tesla.

former Tesla director
Image Source: thewest.com.au

A former executive of Tesla’s Australian unit admitted guilty to two occasions of insider trading based on a supply agreement Tesla signed with Piedmont Lithium in 2020. Kurt Schlosser purchased 86,748 shares of U.S.-based Piedmont in September 2020, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), after learning the specifics of the five-year spodumene concentrate supply agreement with the company.

The ASIC claimed that once the deal was publicly disclosed and the share price increased, Schlosser sold his Piedmont stocks for a profit of about $28,883. According to the watchdog, Schlosser also disclosed the information to a friend who was most likely to invest in the company.

Read More: Tesla Electric Vehicles To Soon Bring Zoom Video Conferencing Feature

Piedmont Lithium announced in September 2020 that it has signed a legally binding five-year contract to provide Tesla with a third of its anticipated 160,000 tonnes per year of spodumene concentrate production, a hard rock ore commodity used to make battery-grade lithium compounds. The company’s share price increased six times following the deal.

The company intended to supply the concentrate for Tesla between July 2022-July 2023 However, due to delays in the approval procedure for its mine facility in North Carolina, it had to postpone delivery to Tesla indefinitely last year. The agreement was primarily seen as a way to reduce volatility in the commodity, whose value had been declining since 2019.

Many automakers directly signed such deals with mining companies. The support of a major automaker like Tesla can assist early-stage mining companies like Piedmont to get funding from lenders and enhance their financial position.

Former Tesla Director has not yet received a punishment and will show up in court on December 16 in Sydney District Court. The maximum punishment for insider trading, according to ASIC, is 15 years behind bars.

Piedmont Lithium has dual listings in the US and Australia. The company changed its principal listing to New York, USA last year and relocated its headquarters from Australia to the USA.

Recently, a power steering issue in the Model X and Model S vehicles sold between 2017-2020 led to the recall of over 1000 Tesla vehicles in Australia. On Wednesday, the Department of Transport released the advisory, warning that the issue might raise the possibility of collisions that cause “serious injury or death to vehicle occupants and other road users.”

The most recent Australian Tesla recall was issued for 1012 Tesla vehicles due to a possibility that their Electronic Power Assist Steering system could lose power and demand “a greater steering effort from the driver,”, especially at low speeds. There have been two Tesla recalls in Australia in the past two weeks. In the prior recall, 326 Model 3 cars had a seatbelt problem.

Recently, U.S. Senator Ed Markey reportedly warned Elon Musk to fix his companies “or Congress will,” while the U.S. Federal Trade Commission said it was closely monitoring recent events at Twitter “with deep worry.”

contract workers

Elon Musk fires thousands of contract workers without notice

According to reports, Twitter has terminated thousands of contract workers as Elon Musk appears to be taking strong steps to revive the once-dominant social media platform. Platformer estimates that employment cuts have affected over 4400 out of 5500 contract workers.

contract workers
Image Source: pynr.in

The widespread firings, which affect both US-based and international staff working in real estate, marketing, content moderation, engineering, and other departments, were first reported on by Platformer on Saturday night.

According to Platformer’s Casey Newton, Twitter fired a sizable number of contract workers on Saturday, impacting anywhere between 4,400 and 5,500 individuals. Most contract workers didn’t get any notice that they were fired and only learned of their dismissal after being denied access to the company email and inner communications systems.

According to CNBC, the fired employees didn’t discover they had been fired until they lost access to Slack as well as other work networks over the weekend. Twitter states that the job losses are a result of a “reprioritization and savings exercise” in an internal message sent to contract employees that Business Insider was able to obtain.

Read More: Twitter To Let Users Post Long-Form Tweets and help creators monetize

Platformer’s Casey Newton noted, “Contractors aren’t being notified at all, they’re just losing access to Slack and email. Managers figured it out when their workers just disappeared from the system.”

A bunch of Twitter officials have either resigned or been dismissed since Musk took over, and more employees will probably be let go due to the company’s new in-person work requirement. Elon Musk sacked Twitter’s CEO Parag Agrawal, CFO Ned Segal, and head of legal policy, trust, and safety Vijaya Gadde as soon as he took control of the platform.

Since that time, a number of high-profile employees have left Twitter. Only “exceptional people” are permitted to work remotely, according to a Q&A session between Elon and Twitter employees.  Musk remarked, “Basically if you can show up in an office and you do not show up at the office, resignation accepted.” The company’s communications division is no longer in operation.

Since taking over the Twitter business in the final week of October, Musk has been seeking to overhaul the entire system by firing top executives, cutting manpower by 50%, charging users for the “verified” tick, and other measures. The Tesla CEO has received harsh criticism for his handling of the crisis and for firing some employees without notifying them in advance. Twitter even barred access to its headquarters and instructed staff to wait in their homes for company communications.

Silicon Valley is reeling from a slump across the entire sector. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, just announced widespread layoffs, eliminating 11,000 positions, or around 13% of the workforce. The company overhired during the pandemic, but eventually realized the hyper boom isn’t sustainable, according to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who called the layoffs “some of the most difficult changes we’ve made in Meta’s history.”

In addition to Twitter and Meta, major tech giants like Apple, Amazon, and Alphabet have announced they will halt hiring or make job cuts due to inflation and recessionary fears. The companies are allegedly operating in a more risky environment, which is causing them to spend less on business expansion.

ftx

Coinbase to lay off more employees amid FTX saga

Leading cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase will shortly announce more layoffs as the industry faces yet another existential threat following the FTX collapse.

ftx
Image Source: bizzbuzz.news

According to recent reports, the present crisis in the cryptocurrency market led Coinbase, one of the biggest crypto platforms, to lay off 60 of its employees. Alesia Haas, CFO, referred to the modifications as “surgical” measures meant to save costs amid trying times.

According to The Information, Coinbase is expected to lay off about 60 employees from its recruitment and institutional induction teams. The layoffs were communicated internally. The layoffs will occur at a time when the cryptocurrency market as a whole is in disarray as a result of the ongoing FTX controversy, which has spooked investors and further depressed cryptocurrency valuations.

Though they are not nearly as astounding as Meta’s decision to lay off over 11,000 employees recently, Coinbase’s most recent series of layoffs is an indication that the crypto exchange may be attempting to cut expenses in the continuing bear market. Nevertheless, this development barely changes the picture of a week that has been filled with terrible news for the cryptocurrency industry.

According to reports, Coinbase had already attempted to minimize costs before the FTX issues as dropping cryptocurrency trading volumes were harming this year’s profitability. Due to the economic slump, the cryptocurrency exchange company stated in June that it will be cutting 1,100 employees or 18% of its workforce.

As the value of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies continues to fall, the crash of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange has now brought about yet another wave of threats to the whole crypto industry.

When bitcoin was trading last week at over $21,500 and the market cap was over $1 billion, the cryptocurrency winter, which is expected to linger for the majority of 2022, appeared to have eased its hold. Hopes that a new bull run is about to begin, however, were dashed by FTX’s collapse this week.

At one point, the value of the cryptocurrency market fell below $850 billion, with bitcoin falling to a two-year low of about $15,500.

According to statistics from Nomics, transaction volume on Coinbase fell by over 75% in the hours after FTX announced its bankruptcy early on Friday. This is an indication that the company is starting to feel the pain of crypto investors pulling out of the increasingly unpredictable cryptocurrency market.

The majority of Coinbase’s user base, which consists primarily of newer investors who don’t trade frequently, generates 90% of the exchange’s revenue from the sizeable transaction fees it charges. Because of this revenue model, the company must constantly add new users in order to maintain its user base. Onboarding new users, however, could be challenging given that FTX’s collapse has undermined investor sentiment in the digital asset sector.

The price of cryptocurrencies plummeted this year as a result of rising interest rates and growing concerns about an economic slowdown, wiping out important firms like Three Arrows Capital, Celsius Network, and Voyager Digital. But once FTX started to show early signs of trouble, digital assets took a heavier hit.

FTX, which has a history of saving failing crypto companies, is considering its options in light of a liquidity crisis and is currently under investigation by US regulators for its management of customer cash and its crypto-lending activities.